Performance
- Most edi files are just a few kilobyes. An edi file of 5Mb is very large (edifact, x12). If you encounter larger ones: please let me know.
- AFAIK there are no issues with performance. If you run into this: please inform me eg via mailing list.
More performance
- (Bots >= 2.2.0) Cdecimals (Extern library) speeds up bots. This library will be included in python 3.3, but can be installed in earlier python versions. See website
- (bots >= 3.1) Do not use get_checklevel=2 in config/bots.ini. This does extended checking of mpath's, use this during development only.
- (bots >= 3.0) Schedule bots-engine via the job queue server.
- For xml: check if the c-version of python's elementtree is installed and used.
- Enough memory is important for performance: disk-memory swapping is slow! Actual memory usage depends on size of edi-files.
- Check mappings for slow/inefficient algorithms.
- Bots works with [www.pypy.org pypy], see below on this page.
- Use SSD for faster reading/writing. In config/bots.ini the botssys-directory can be set, in config/settings.py the place of the SQLite-database.
Strategy for bigger edi volumes
- Best strategy is to schedule bots-engine more often.
- (bots >= 3.0) Schedule bots-engine via the job queue server.
- Routes can be scheduled independently.
-
Set-up good scheduling, keeping volumes in mind.
- edi in the real world has often large peaks.
- some edi transactions are time critical (eg orders), others not so much (eg invoices)
- check where the large volumes are (size and number of edi-transactions)
- look at the sending pattern of your customers. Often edi is send in night jobs, so you might receive lot of volume early in the morning.
- check where you send large volumes. Send this at a time that does not interfere with other flows.
-
Incoming volumes can be limited per run. This way the time bots-engine runs is predictable. The max time a channel fetches incoming files is a parameter for each channel. Note: this is dependent upon the communication type used; eg file system I/O is much faster than SFTP. Files "left behind" will be fetched on subsequent runs.
- (Bots >= 3.0) Limit for max file-size (set in bots.ini). If an incoming file is larger, bots will give error. This is to prevent 'accidents'.
Performance/throughput testing
- Tests are done using file system I/O (no testing of communication performance).
- Tests done in one run of bots-engine.
- Test system: Intel Q9400 2.66GHz; 4Gb memory; ubuntu 10.04(lucid); python 2.7; default SQLite database.
- Please note that these tests are 'artificial': if you have such high volumes and big files look at good scheduling!
- test are with edifact; x12 performance is the same.
bots2.0 | bots2.2 | (cdecimal) | bots3.2 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
description | #file | vol | #mess. | time | time | time | |||
01 edifact2fixed | 32 | 305Mb | 32 | 1:01:39 | 82 kb/s | 0:50:57 | 100 kb/s | 0:44:01 | 115 kb/s |
02 edifact2fixed | 116 | 300Mb | 116 | 1:14:18 | 68 kb/s | 0:36:20 | 137 kb/s | 0:37:25 | 133 kb/s |
03 edifact2fixed | 94048 | 295Mb | 141072 | 0:47:21 | 104 kb/s | 0:39:54 | 125 kb/s | 0:42:30 | 115 kb/s |
04 fixed2edifact | 14244 | 300Mb | 78342 | 1:04:11 | 78 kb/s | 0:33:21 | 150 kb/s | 0:32:40 | 153 kb/s |
05 xml2edifact | 17424 | 300Mb | 17424 | 0:41:24 | 121 kb/s | 0:35:48 | 139 kb/s | 0:35:20 | 141 kb/s |
06 edifact2xml(1to1) | 14609 | 300Mb | 74919 | 1:23:03 | 60 kb/s | 0:58:19 | 85 kb/s | 0:44:38 | 112 kb/s |
Conclusions of performance measurements
- Memory usage is stable (no leakage).
- Memory usage is directly related to the size of the edi-files. In test 01 (edifact files of 9.5Mb) bots-engine uses 1.5Gb memory.
- Tested with edifact files of 120Mb; memory usage is stable at 4.5Gb.
- Performance is reasonably independent from the size of edi-files/messages.
- an edifact file of 9.5Mb takes about 85sec to be processed.
- for outgoing edi files: writing to one file or multiple file does not significantly affect performance.
Testing with pypy
pypy is a python implementation that is faster by using a
JIT (that is one of their achievements...).
Results of the first tests with pypy (beta-versions of pypy 2.0):
- Bots works with pypy.
- Comparing some stress tests: much faster, 2-3 times faster.
- Did not run all test-sets. Probably I will do that with definitive version of pypy 2.0 and/or release of bots 3.1.
- Problem might be that not all libraries/dependencies work with pypy.
- SQLite3 database connector: OK
- MySQL database connector: version 1.2.5 does. Note that bots 3.1.0 gave am error with this version, a patch was easy.
- paramiko (for SFTP/SSH): no, dependency pycrypto is not supported. This looks like a very interesting development!